Church History Seven Churches in Bible Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Church History Seven Churches in Bible - Essay Example As per their conviction whatever is referenced in the good book is the expression of God (Kwintessential, nd). As indicated by the idea of Dever (nd), the Church has a significant impact in the improvement of the Christian culture and religion. In his audit he brought up the way that the principleadopted by the congregation is a vitalfactor of Christian truth. As per his sentiment It is the most observable piece of Christian religious philosophy too, and it is fundamentally associated with each other piece of the Christian culture. (Dever, nd).In this paper, the primary target is to talk about the underlying phases of the improvement of Christian culture and religion. The principle target of this paper is to investigate the underlying phases of the advancement of the Christian culture over the globe, how it ready to spread all finished and what are the effect of this idea and manner of thinking in the general public. Examination Questions: This is primarily an exploration paper which has the attention on the Christian religion and culture over the globe. In present world the Christian religion is the biggest and has its essence everywhere throughout the globe in all the nations. Yet, the circumstance dislike that in the underlying stage. The examination inquiries of this paper are as per the following: 1. How the Christian religions create over the globe with the time? 2. Throughout the long stretches of the turn of events, what are the issues that the individuals who put stock in this religion and culture need to face and how they ready to battle those. 3. How the seven places of worship referenced in the holy book ready to spread the idea of Christ in the general public? 4. What as per the cutting edge age individuals are the key behind the accomplishment of the religion? Foundation: Development of the Topic: The congregation is the foundation of the advancement of the Christian religion over the world. Toward the start there were loads of protest from the in dividuals who were the decision authority of the general public. Be that as it may, regardless of their protest the point of view began to pick up notoriety all over the globe. As indicated by the investigation of Patheos Library (nd), Christianity created from the manner of thinking of Judaism in the first Century C.E. The idea of Christian religion is altogether founded on the life, showing philosophy passing, and restoration of the Jesus Christ. As per the survey of the Patheos Library, there are a few parts of the Christianity, every one of the branches has assortment in their convictions and practices, however above all the fundamental guideline was consistently the equivalent. There are three significant classes or branches accessible in the Christian religion; these are Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, and Protestantism. There are a few sub-classifications likewise in all these three branches. The convention conviction of the Christian people group is there is one and on ly God on the planet, they used to accept that the Jesus was the celestial and he was send by the all strong to spare this world. Having confidence in Christ is the essential perspective of the religion. The fundamental content where the whole idea and the manner of thinking of Christ were noted is the Bible. It incorporates both the Hebrew Scripturesâ and the New Testament. The Hebrew Scriptures is otherwise called the Old Testament. The fundamental idea of the Christian is for the most part dependent on love, partnership, investigation of the God, and furthermore by the commitment with rest of the

Accounting and Finance Theory and Practice

Question: Talk about the Accounting and Finance for Theory and Practice. Answer: Presentation The survey and examination of the fiscal summaries is significant for associations to spread the budgetary data to financial specialists and lenders. The budgetary data got from the fiscal reports frames the reason for assessing the exhibition of an association. Business associations distribute the budget reports in the yearly report for imparting the significant budgetary data to worry outside parties.Creditors and speculators depend on the money related data conveyed by an organization for wellbeing and gainfulness of their ventures. The budget reports give point by point data about the benefits speculations and remarkable obligations to the partners. The companys chiefs can likewise effectively choose the capital structure by keeping up a sufficient harmony among value and obligation. The investigations of the budget reports demonstrate as a basic instrument for the companys chiefs to assess over a significant time span execution. It additionally evaluates the vulnerability of thi ngs to come incomes and along these lines bolsters the dynamic procedure of the association. In this specific circumstance, the current report expects to audit and inspect the money related situation of Graincorp for assessing its monetary presentation. Graincorp is an Australian based organization that is perceived as a pioneer in food fixings and agribusiness. The companys exercises depend on three primary center grains, that is, wheat, grain and canola. The organization has a near bit of leeway in starts of these grains as far as specialized skill and cargo differentials. The organization works its business capacities in the United Kingdom, New Zealand, North America, and Europe other than Australia. It has four announcing portions that are, Storage Logistics, Marketing, Malt and Oils. The organization leads its business capacities through creating and support of a coordinated flexibly chain to complete its operational exercises proficiently. The organization sought to turn into a universal chief in food fixings and agribusiness by making an incentive for every one of its partners. The organization builds up a working environment culture that targets guaranteeing representatives and client government assistance through reception of best work rehearses (Annual Report, 2015). The current report, in such manner, audits the monetary presentation of the organization for distinguishing the territories of progress required for improving its productivity later on setting. Investigation of Financial Statements of Graincorp Company Explanation of Financial position Explanation of money related position is another term utilized for accounting report. This announcement shows the estimation of advantages, liabilities and value of the organization toward the finish of the money related year. All the sum that are introduced in the fiscal summaries are acclimated to the parities of things toward the start of year and any progressions made in the present itself. The structure introduced in the budget report is actually like ordinary bookkeeping condition. Thus, bookkeeping condition utilized in the announcement of money related position is spoken to as Assets = Liabilities + Stockholders Equity. Articulation of budgetary position is viewed as one of the significant fiscal summaries as it encourages the clients to assess the monetary exhibition of the organization in regard to liquidity, obligation value position, money related execution and business hazard (Brigham and Ehrhardt, 2011). In this area, significant subtleties of budgetary situation of Graincorp Company are assessed in the terms of execution through contrasting the present year figures and a year ago figures. Each thing in monetary record has its significance and gives certain data that helps the clients of budget report to contrast the companys current year execution and the most recent year execution. In this manner, significant things in a critical position sheet of Graincorp Company will be assessed utilizing the parities in the announcement and notes to articulations. The following are significant figures of the equalization of Graincorp Company in year 2015 and 2014 and furthermore percent expansion or decline. Proclamation of Financial Position Graincorp Company (Figures in Million Dollars) Things 2015 2014 Increment of Decrease % Increase or Decrease in year 2015 Absolute Current Assets $ 1,497.90 $ 1,368.40 $ 129.50 9.46% All out Non-Current Assets $ 2,175.80 $ 1,964.80 $ 211.00 10.74% All out Assets $ 3,673.70 $ 3,333.20 $ 340.50 10.22% All out Current Liabilities $ 871.00 $ 845.30 $ 25.70 3.04% All out Non Current Liabilities $ 980.90 $ 743.40 $ 237.50 31.95% All out Liabilities $ 1,851.90 $ 1,588.70 $ 263.20 16.57% All out Equity $ 1,821.80 $ 1,744.50 $ 77.30 4.43% The above table speaks to the figures in a critical position sheet of Graincorp Company for year 2015 and 2014. The expansion and decline in things of equalization in regard of year 2015 has additionally been spoken to as rate. On taking a gander at the table it tends to be said that in year 2015, Graincorp Company has performed well as all the things in balance have positive increment in sum in year 2015. The estimation of current resources was expanded by 9.46% that shows that liquidity position of the organization is acceptable. Taking a gander at the figures of non current resources it tends to be said that Graincorp has put a serious decent sum in fixed resources in year 2015. There was increment of 10.74% in the estimation of non current resources in year 2015 as contrast with year 2014. Altogether, there was 10.22 % expansion in estimation of benefits that shows Graincorp organization has made critical development in year 2015 (Annual Report, 2015). While discussing risk area it very well may be seen that there was little increment in estimation of current liabilities though estimation of non current liabilities has expanded with more prominent distinction. The estimation of current liabilities was expanded by 3.04 % and estimation of current resources expanded by 9.46 % that reflects organization has made huge changes in accordance with alter the liquidity position (Mumba, 2013). Estimation of non current liabilities was expanded to 31.95 %, which plainly shows that Graincorp has taken obligation from the budgetary organizations to back the exercises. The expansion in value by 4.43% speaks to increment in estimation of value sum, holds and held income (Annual Report, 2015). Articulation of Change in Equity The announcement of investors value is profoundly significant for acquiring data with respect to the progressions in different value segments including held profit. Investors value portrays the total assets of an organization by distinguishing the distinction between all out resources and all out liabilities. Proclamation of Change in Equity Graincorp Company (Figures in Million Dollars) Things 2015 2014 Increment of Decrease % Increase or Decrease in year 2015 Estimation of Contributed Equity $ 1,346.00 $ 1,344.80 $ 1.20 0.09% Number of Shares (Equity) 228855628 228855628 $ - 0.00% All out Reserves $ 116.80 $ 40.80 $ 76.00 186.27% Held Earnings $ 359.00 $ 358.90 $ 0.10 0.03% Estimation of Total Equity $ 1,821.00 $ 1,744.50 $ 76.50 4.39% The table mirrors every single significant worth introduced in the announcement of changes in value of Graincorp Company. On taking a gander at the general changes in the value estimation of organization it tends to be said that there was exceptionally little change in the estimations of the value. In this manner, it suggests that organization has not issue any value share in year 2015 to back development just as acquisition of fixed resources. The worth contributed value has expanded to 1346 million dollar in year from 1344.80 million in year 2014, indicating an expansion of 0.09 % (Annual Report, 2015). There was no adjustment in number of value shares gave in the open market. There was change in number of treasury partakes in year 2015 in light of the fact that some of treasury was reclaimed by the organization. There was significant change in estimation of held income (Houston and Brigham, 2009). Estimation of held profit was brought by 186.27 % up in year 2015 as it was in year 2014. There was very little change in held income when both year figure was looked at (Annual Report, 2015). Proclamation of Profit and Loss account The benefit and misfortune proclamations of an organization sums up the incomes, expenses and costs that is caused during a specific timeframe. It ends up being valuable for the financial specialists and lenders to build up a comprehension of the business forms utilized by an association to create salary and deal with its expenses. Organizations can likewise effectively make forecasts with respect to the future costs including rent, compensations, hardware buys and overhead expenses. Benefit and misfortune proclamation empowers an association to create future methodologies for improving its income and decreasing the expenses. Articulation of Profit and Loss Graincorp Company (Figures in Million Dollars) Things 2015 2014 Increment of Decrease % Increase or Decrease in year 2015 Income $ 4,064.00 $ 4,169.10 $ (105.10) - 2.52% Cost of Goods Sold $ 3,292.70 $ 3,347.00 $ (54.30) - 1.62% Aggregates Expenses before Income Tax Expense $ 4,029.50 $ 4,113.60 $ (84.10) - 2.04% Non working addition or (misfortune) $ 72.40 $ 16.10 $ 56.30 349.69% Gaining per Share $ 0.14 $ 0.22 $ (0.08) - 36.36% Annual Tax $ 11.50 $ 14.80 $ (3.30) - 22.30% Money Cost (Interest) $ 43.00 $ 45.00 $ (2.00) - 4.44% Total compensation $ 43.60 $ 65.10

The Schizophrenia Concept Timeline Highlights

The Schizophrenia Concept Timeline Highlights Schizophrenia Print The Schizophrenia Concept Timeline Highlights By Adrian Preda, MD Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Steven Gans, MD on August 05, 2016 Steven Gans, MD is board-certified in psychiatry and is an active supervisor, teacher, and mentor at Massachusetts General Hospital. Learn about our Medical Review Board Steven Gans, MD Updated on January 31, 2020 Schizophrenia Overview Symptoms & Diagnosis Causes & Risk Factors Treatment Living With In Children There is no single person who can be credited with discovering schizophrenia. Since the 19th century, there have been many medical professionals and researchers who have contributed to our growing understanding of what its like to live with mental illness. Here are a few highlights of the history of schizophrenia as well as how we understand it today. Schizophrenia or Schizophrenias? When it comes to classifying schizophrenia, there are lumpers, who like to group things into broad categories, and splitters, who divide things into smaller categories. Lumpers view schizophrenia as a unitary or single disorder while splitters say it is different disorders conveniently grouped under one category. The best way to understand these points of view is to review the historical development of the schizophrenia concept. 1852, Rouen, France In Études cliniques (1852; “Clinical Studies”), Bénédict Morel, a French physician and the director of the mental asylum at Saint-Yon in  Rouen, first used the term démence précoce (premature dementia) to describe the clinical picture of a group of young patients with thought disorganization and an overall disorder of will (perhaps what we refer to as avolition today). At that time, dementia had a different meaning than it does today. It did not imply a chronic and irreversible course or cognitive problems (e.g. difficulties in the areas of memory, attention, concentration, problem-solving). 1891, Prague, Austro-Hungarian Empire This was the first recorded use of the term dementia praecox by Arnold Pick, a Czech neurologist, and psychiatrist who reports on a patient with a clinical presentation consistent with what would today be diagnosed as a psychotic disorder. 1893, Heidelberg, Germany Emil Kraepelin moved from grouping mental disorders based on superficial similarities between major symptoms to grouping mental disorders based on their course over time. He became known for distinguishing dementia praecox (a premature  dementia or precocious madness) with its chronic and persistent course from manic depression. Whats more, he distinguished dementia praecox from dementia paranoides (paranoia) and catatonia, which align with many of the symptoms we see in people with schizophrenia today. Kraepelin, who initially had a splitter view of the disorder, eventually grouped the different presentations as “clinical forms” of essentially one disorder: dementia praecox, which is the official predecessor of schizophrenia. An Overview of Schizophrenia 1907, Zürich, Switzerland Eugen Bleuler (in photo) coined the term schizophrenia and described the distinct subtypes of the disorder, stating that schizophrenia is not a disease in the strict sense, but appears to be a group of diseases.  Therefore, we should speak of schizophrenias in the plural. Bleuler introduced the concept of primary and secondary schizophrenic symptoms, defining the four primary symptoms of schizophrenia (the four As). The Four A's of Schizophrenia Abnormal associationsAutistic behavior and thinkingAbnormal affectAmbivalence He also stated that loss of association between thought processes and emotion and behavior were central symptoms and could lead to secondary disease manifestations like hallucinations, delusions, social withdrawal, and diminished drive. A notable difference between Bleuler and Kraepelin is that Bleuler conducted clinical observations, practically living in the peoples surroundings, while Kraepelin collected information from patient records. 20th Century to Recent Past Mental health experts continued to redefine the definition of schizophrenia as well as its classification and agreed (and continue to agree) on four main categories of symptoms that occur in schizophrenia: Positive symptomsNegative symptomsCognitive symptomsAffective symptoms Positive versus negative schizophrenia and deficit and non-deficit schizophrenia were also proposed as different schizophrenia types. The ”lumpers” believe that, despite differences in presentation, disease course, and response to medications, these symptoms (or types) are in fact different forms of one common underlying abnormality that are characteristic of schizophrenia, but yet to be determined On the other hand, the “splitters” believe that schizophrenias as opposed to schizophrenia better describes the differences in presentation, course, prognosis, and response to treatment for different groups of patients. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM III through DSM-IV) proposed five different types of schizophrenia: ParanoidDisorganizedCatatonicResidualUndifferentiated The AntiPsychiatry View The term “antipsychiatry” was coined in 1967 by David Cooper who questioned the diagnosis and treatment of schizophrenia. Copper and the many others involved in the antipsychiatry movement in the 1950s and 1960s viewed psychiatric practices like electroshock therapy and psychosurgery (frontal lobotomy) as inhumane and demanded improvements in shabby state hospitals or asylums. The discovery of antipsychotics in the 1950s also prompted an outcry, as these drugs were found to produce neurological side effects. The antipsychiatry view of schizophrenia was that it was not a “real” disease or a myth; it could not be detected by any physical tests. To many, psychosis was “understandable” and a way of coping with a “sick society” or “schizophrenogenic parents” who harmed their offspring.   Activists also believed that psychiatry deprived people of their rights, calling it “subversive, left-wing, anti-American, and communist.” These concepts were also appealing to many religious folks who viewed mental illness as a “moral issue” handled by the church rather than a medical issue treated by doctors.   Understanding Schizophrenia Today Today, schizophrenia is viewed as a prototypical mental disorder. This means that people with schizophrenia experience significant thought and mood variations and, as a result, have different degrees of psychosocial disability (disorders that impact emotions, behaviors, and cognitive abilities). While most mental health experts believe that schizophrenia is a mental disorder with biological roots, others say it is a social construct, a product of cultural norms and expectations imposed on a non-conforming individual. The most recent version, DSM V (released in 2013) has taken a lumpers approach when it comes to classifying schizophrenia. There are no longer subtypes of schizophrenia (paranoid schizophrenia, disorganized,  catatonic, residual, undifferentiated), which were determined unhelpful in regard to treating schizophrenia or predicting treatment outcomes. This isnt to say the splitting-lumping debate is over. With increased knowledge about genetic differences and advances in patient-centered medicine, it is possible that the pendulum might swing back to a splitting perspective of schizophrenia in the future.

The Schizophrenia Concept Timeline Highlights

The Schizophrenia Concept Timeline Highlights Schizophrenia Print The Schizophrenia Concept Timeline Highlights By Adrian Preda, MD Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Steven Gans, MD on August 05, 2016 Steven Gans, MD is board-certified in psychiatry and is an active supervisor, teacher, and mentor at Massachusetts General Hospital. Learn about our Medical Review Board Steven Gans, MD Updated on January 31, 2020 Schizophrenia Overview Symptoms & Diagnosis Causes & Risk Factors Treatment Living With In Children There is no single person who can be credited with discovering schizophrenia. Since the 19th century, there have been many medical professionals and researchers who have contributed to our growing understanding of what its like to live with mental illness. Here are a few highlights of the history of schizophrenia as well as how we understand it today. Schizophrenia or Schizophrenias? When it comes to classifying schizophrenia, there are lumpers, who like to group things into broad categories, and splitters, who divide things into smaller categories. Lumpers view schizophrenia as a unitary or single disorder while splitters say it is different disorders conveniently grouped under one category. The best way to understand these points of view is to review the historical development of the schizophrenia concept. 1852, Rouen, France In Études cliniques (1852; “Clinical Studies”), Bénédict Morel, a French physician and the director of the mental asylum at Saint-Yon in  Rouen, first used the term démence précoce (premature dementia) to describe the clinical picture of a group of young patients with thought disorganization and an overall disorder of will (perhaps what we refer to as avolition today). At that time, dementia had a different meaning than it does today. It did not imply a chronic and irreversible course or cognitive problems (e.g. difficulties in the areas of memory, attention, concentration, problem-solving). 1891, Prague, Austro-Hungarian Empire This was the first recorded use of the term dementia praecox by Arnold Pick, a Czech neurologist, and psychiatrist who reports on a patient with a clinical presentation consistent with what would today be diagnosed as a psychotic disorder. 1893, Heidelberg, Germany Emil Kraepelin moved from grouping mental disorders based on superficial similarities between major symptoms to grouping mental disorders based on their course over time. He became known for distinguishing dementia praecox (a premature  dementia or precocious madness) with its chronic and persistent course from manic depression. Whats more, he distinguished dementia praecox from dementia paranoides (paranoia) and catatonia, which align with many of the symptoms we see in people with schizophrenia today. Kraepelin, who initially had a splitter view of the disorder, eventually grouped the different presentations as “clinical forms” of essentially one disorder: dementia praecox, which is the official predecessor of schizophrenia. An Overview of Schizophrenia 1907, Zürich, Switzerland Eugen Bleuler (in photo) coined the term schizophrenia and described the distinct subtypes of the disorder, stating that schizophrenia is not a disease in the strict sense, but appears to be a group of diseases.  Therefore, we should speak of schizophrenias in the plural. Bleuler introduced the concept of primary and secondary schizophrenic symptoms, defining the four primary symptoms of schizophrenia (the four As). The Four A's of Schizophrenia Abnormal associationsAutistic behavior and thinkingAbnormal affectAmbivalence He also stated that loss of association between thought processes and emotion and behavior were central symptoms and could lead to secondary disease manifestations like hallucinations, delusions, social withdrawal, and diminished drive. A notable difference between Bleuler and Kraepelin is that Bleuler conducted clinical observations, practically living in the peoples surroundings, while Kraepelin collected information from patient records. 20th Century to Recent Past Mental health experts continued to redefine the definition of schizophrenia as well as its classification and agreed (and continue to agree) on four main categories of symptoms that occur in schizophrenia: Positive symptomsNegative symptomsCognitive symptomsAffective symptoms Positive versus negative schizophrenia and deficit and non-deficit schizophrenia were also proposed as different schizophrenia types. The ”lumpers” believe that, despite differences in presentation, disease course, and response to medications, these symptoms (or types) are in fact different forms of one common underlying abnormality that are characteristic of schizophrenia, but yet to be determined On the other hand, the “splitters” believe that schizophrenias as opposed to schizophrenia better describes the differences in presentation, course, prognosis, and response to treatment for different groups of patients. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM III through DSM-IV) proposed five different types of schizophrenia: ParanoidDisorganizedCatatonicResidualUndifferentiated The AntiPsychiatry View The term “antipsychiatry” was coined in 1967 by David Cooper who questioned the diagnosis and treatment of schizophrenia. Copper and the many others involved in the antipsychiatry movement in the 1950s and 1960s viewed psychiatric practices like electroshock therapy and psychosurgery (frontal lobotomy) as inhumane and demanded improvements in shabby state hospitals or asylums. The discovery of antipsychotics in the 1950s also prompted an outcry, as these drugs were found to produce neurological side effects. The antipsychiatry view of schizophrenia was that it was not a “real” disease or a myth; it could not be detected by any physical tests. To many, psychosis was “understandable” and a way of coping with a “sick society” or “schizophrenogenic parents” who harmed their offspring.   Activists also believed that psychiatry deprived people of their rights, calling it “subversive, left-wing, anti-American, and communist.” These concepts were also appealing to many religious folks who viewed mental illness as a “moral issue” handled by the church rather than a medical issue treated by doctors.   Understanding Schizophrenia Today Today, schizophrenia is viewed as a prototypical mental disorder. This means that people with schizophrenia experience significant thought and mood variations and, as a result, have different degrees of psychosocial disability (disorders that impact emotions, behaviors, and cognitive abilities). While most mental health experts believe that schizophrenia is a mental disorder with biological roots, others say it is a social construct, a product of cultural norms and expectations imposed on a non-conforming individual. The most recent version, DSM V (released in 2013) has taken a lumpers approach when it comes to classifying schizophrenia. There are no longer subtypes of schizophrenia (paranoid schizophrenia, disorganized,  catatonic, residual, undifferentiated), which were determined unhelpful in regard to treating schizophrenia or predicting treatment outcomes. This isnt to say the splitting-lumping debate is over. With increased knowledge about genetic differences and advances in patient-centered medicine, it is possible that the pendulum might swing back to a splitting perspective of schizophrenia in the future.