Four Principles Essay

Community corrections atomic number 18 non-prison sanctions that atomic number 18 imposed on convicted adults or adjudicated juveniles either by a coquette instead of a prison prison term or by a unloosen board following release from prison. (Joan Petersilia Para. 1) on that point argon quaternity general normals of good discourse that be in possession of become organizing concepts of in alliance corrections in what has become cognise as the what whole kit movement. In this split I im plowshare describe all four of the general article of faiths of single-valued functionful hitch, hazard principle, criminogenic need principle, preaching principle, and faithfulness principle, and the centering they snuff it.The showtime of the four principles of efficacious encumbrance is peril principle. Risk principle tells us that interpolation platforms should use a integrate of cognitive and behavioural strategies (Wright, 2012.) This is saying that the interferen ce should place high risk offenders, to proscribe them from reoffending. Research has proved that objectiveing high risk offenders employs more often therefore tar attempt holding low risk offenders. Certain offenses atomic number 18 considered low risk and others high. That is what qualifies you as a low and high risk offender by what offense you committed the first time. Moreover, research also shows that targeting low-risk offenders with intensive intercession tummy actually increase their reoffending (Latessa, 2010). That is why indoors the four principles it does not target low right offenders. I chequer with this system completely, we should pay more caution to the more sound offenders, be private road if they did a serious offense in the first place, they get out do it again, and wemust target these corporation to try and stop them.According to Gendra and Paparozzi with department of corrections Today, When Robert Martinson predicted some 20 years ag iodin that the new epoch in corrections would focus on punishment, many of us who were utilizationing in the system at that time did not realize how prescient he was. Today, the U.S. corrections system relies on the threat of punishment to pose near law-abiding behavior. Evidence of this can be seen in the proliferation of intensive supervision programs (ISPs), lift cantonments, shock incarceration and battalions prisons. (Gendreau, P., & Paparozzi, M. A., 1995) I know that this intervention whole kit and caboodle because I produce been to boot camp myself, and as they call it the scare evasive action it really does work. When you do something incorrect or not to standards in the military they pull up stakes scare soldiers with punishment, the reason it scares the soldiers is because they know that they allow for go through with the punishment because they defecate been punished before.The second of the four principles of effective intervention is ciminogenic need principle. Crimin ogenic need principle posits that intervention programs must focus on change factors related to the offenders antisocial conduct. Some of the important factors to target include antisocial set and attitudes, perfume abuse, antisocial peers, impaired families, and poor decision-making and problem-solving skills. alas many intervention programs target factors that ready humble or nothing to do with an individuals current venomous behavior. (Wright, F2012) When going up in a dysfunctional family, you learn that it is agreeable to be that way. When gang member have children , their children grow up infering that what their elicit is doing is acceptable, so when they get to the age that they can advert their own decisions, they do what they grew up knowing, gang banging.On the contrary an suit I am going to bring up the incident that happened in computerized axial tomography a couple days ago. The cause of death did not have a dysfunctional family, but the old babysitter ha d describe that when she would watch him his mother would say to never take her eye off of him, hitherto when going to the bathroom which can traffic pattern a theory that he had unceasingly acted up in odd ways. The deuce-ace of the four principles ofeffective intervention is the interposition principle. The treatment principle tells us that intervention programs should use a mix of cognitive and behavioral strategies. As John Wright states, cognitive draw neares confront the way offenders think, their sad values and attitudes, and their decision making.Behavioral approaches, by contrast, set about to model, reward, and reinforce prosocial behavior. Numerous studies show that cognitive-behavioral strategies work better than other intervention strategies for offenders, including nondirective lecture therapy and psychoanalytic approaches. Nondirective approaches do not bunk to work with most offenders because they are unremarkably concrete in their thinking and not always able to think rationally. (J. Wright, 2012)When you are in prison, if you do not get into trouble they will send you to a work camp, which gives you more privileges than the average prisoner. When you get in trouble in prison, they will take away any little privileges that you do have, that would be an example of behavioral approaches. An example of a cognitive approach would be to have a wrong in therapy, with a physiological technical who would know how to pick the offenders brain to foreshadow out the way they think therefore question them on the reason they think like that.The fourth and last principle of effective intervention is the fidelity principle. The fidelity principle is in affect to make it so that the other three principles are being held to the standard. Some individuals should never work with offenders. When they do they often reinforce fell thinking patterns and antisocial behavior (J. Wright 2012). The people that work with these offenders must be one hundre d percent qualified, and well as have proven positive results of their work or else their job in this intervention is useless. The working will just cause the offenders to get worst. All the jobs within the intervention are important because if everyone is not doing their part within the program then the results from the program will not look effective.These four principles have been proven to be effective and I believe that if we continue to use it, that we will avoid many offenders from have a secondoffense and exert the crime rate down within our country. In this essay you have learned all four of the principles effective in the community corrections, risk principle, crimongenicneed principle, treatment principle, and fidelity principle, and the roles that they play within the intervention.ReferencesBeeler, A. (2007). What works in corrections Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. Corrections Compendium, 32(2), 36-36. Retrieved from http//search.proques t.com/docview/211806856?accountid=32521 Gendreau, P., & Paparozzi, M. A. (1995). Examining what works in community corrections. Corrections Today, 57(1), 28-28. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/215705816?accountid=32521 Petersilia, J (November 2007) What Works In Community Corrections, The PEWCenter of the States. Retrieved by http//www.pewtrusts.orgWright, J (2012) What Works In changing Offenders? Retrieved fromhttps//content.ashford.edu/books/AUCRJ201.12.1